Sunday 25 December 2016

Jignesh Shah Pegged Back, Framed?

Jignesh Shah’s life is no less than a Bollywood script. His rise as ‘The Exchange Man of India’ empowered millions to lead a proud life. He proved his mettle by creating beacons of growth for the Indian economy such as MCX. The way NSEL case has panned out shows forces going out of the way to frame him on flimsy grounds.

From the time he started to show his growth and formed a grip over the exchange market, efforts were made to pull him down and hamper his growth. All his efforts were seemingly going in vain due to multiple incidents, canards and rumours that targeted him.

i.    There was immense pressure on Shah to sell his share to a certain bank, keeping in mind the loans that had been taken. On the contrary, repayment was done in time.

ii.    MCX had to undergo an income tax raid. Even after not finding anything against Shah or MCX, this raid was used as an alibi to disallow him to set up other exchanges.

iii.    FTIL was blacklisted on the basis of a complaint that dates back to almost 10 years and was sorted out too.

iv.    Traders working with FTIL had to undergo a hard time. Approvals for trading to those brokers who preferred Jignesh Shah’s exchange products had to face the brunt of delay, indirect threats and fear of penalties.

v.    There were umpteen efforts to stall MCX public issue by pushing detractors to file frivolous complaints.

vi.    Shah was refused for MCX SX license for equity market segment which was won only through Supreme Court’s intervention.

vii.    MCX proposed several times for a unified regulatory agency for spot, futures and warehousing segments in Indian commodity market system which was never taken in consideration. However, when NSEL case created a spur, it was made to look like MCX was avoiding regulations!


A man who went on to take India’s exchange platform to a different level, regarded as one of India’s greatest visionary, credited with projects that offered employment to millions caught in a web of inexplicable investigative moves springs up multiple questions–is there a plot to this, is it a conspiracy which if decoded may stun the nation as those behind it are bared?

Monday 18 April 2016

A Merger Order That Hurts Public Interest

In February, the passing of an executive order caused ripples in financial circles across the country, even abroad. Passed by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, it relates to forcing the merger of NSEL with its parent body FTIL. Interestingly, that holds against the ministry’s own circular dated April 20, 2011.

The order stands judicial scrutiny for obvious reasons but what is more baffling is the rationale behind it and the hurry it entails. Billed to be in public interest, it can’t defy public interest any more as it clouds over the fate of over 63k FTIL investors. 

NSEL as a body has its own assets and liabilities. That in turn implies that a merger of this body with any other body is unfair, let alone forced. Currently, it has a crunch of Rs. 5600 crore, and overburdening shareholders of FTIL who have a cash reserve of Rs. 2000 crore serves no one.

Understandably, NSEL traders are under the gun too but how does that make the merger any more sensible than sacrificing one body part to save another.   For the 63k shareholders of FTIL, it would be a hard blow as it erodes their net worth and makes them commercially unviable. Now if that happens—no one gains--not even NSEL stakeholders!

It should be clear beyond all doubt that the cash reserves and all profits that arise on the balance sheet of FTIL belong solely to its shareholders. Anything that takes it away from them is a clear violation of their legal right and must not happen for more reasons than those that meet the eye.

People from across the world are watching how we treat a private sector entity and it can be safely said that the picture being formed is not rosy. It hurts India’s reputation as an investment destination and it hurts PM Modi’s pet project ‘Make in India’ and one of the better known faces that has exemplified it-Jignesh Shah.


The merger order seems to be a classic example of financial imprudence and it is to be seen how the court views the whole issue.  However, the silver lining could lie in the recent developments rounding up NSEL brokers and traders who have for long managed to stay untouched. Could it be that after all this while dissent against the merger finally has investigating authorities ruffled up?

Brokers under the scanner in NSEL Scam

Probe into irregularities worth Rs 5,600 crore in the NSEL case is finally penetrating untouched territories. Recently, the Bombay High Court panel ordered audits into investor claims observing discrepancies in the figures submitted by NSEL traders and brokers; a move that widely vindicates Jignesh Shah’s position on the case.

Furthermore, fresh evidence around black money being routed by sister concerns and associates of various NSEL brokers has caught investigators’ attention.  
"It has also been alleged that funds of sister concerns of brokers, which could have been derived from illegal sources, were used to trade on the NSEL platform with an intent to legitimise the said funds, which amounts to money laundering," a senior investigating official said.

The interim order of the HC panel already states, “The committee while processing the claims received from various investors noticed large scale discrepancies between the claim set up by the investors vis-à-vis the data submitted by NSEL. Even the discrepancies in Permanent Account Number were noticed.” It observed 15 instances of such discrepancies with respect to 8 brokers. The order also stated that no reservations would be made I submitting data and information for verification of investor claims.

It should be noted here that there have been complaints against brokers, in the past, related to false assurances, misrepresentation, trading without client’s authority, modification of client code and selling contracts as investment vehicles. There have also been allegations against NSEL brokers and traders for having created fake ledger accounts in the name of their clients without their consent.
While commenting on the case, a senior regulatory official stated that the case seems to be unique as brokers themselves appear to be investors. This is quite in sync with Jignesh Shah’s stand on the issue and the line FTIL has towed since the beginning.

The investigation holds special significance in respect to the facts of the case. Considering the role brokers play on any exchange, the investigation could lead to a landmark step but the questions is—couldn’t it have come earlier especially with FTIL investors, who stand to be crippled pending the forced merger, vehemently trying to get heard ever since the scam broke out. 

Read more
Bombay HC tightens up on brokers in the NSEL case